Analysis Of Motives And Prospects Framework - MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Analysis Of Motives And Prospects Framework. Answer: Introduction: The OLI framework was created by Dunning for the study of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in China. This study emphasizes on the scrutiny of the objects as well purpose in the OLI framework. The given study deals with the German FDI in China. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) plays a crucial role in the globalization of the economy as per Agarwal and Wu (2015). It is quite different from the portfolio investments as it is carried by the MNEs and involves package of assets and intermediate products. From the European countries Germany is the most vital trade partners of China and is further ranked at sixth position. In the year 2003, China was proved to be the third largest beneficiary of FDI after gaining maximum inflows of investments (Chen and Chen 2016). In the same year, German corporations were ranked among the largest investors and known as the leading European investors in China. Few of the emerging organizations of Germany in Chinese market are Volkswagen, Siemens and Bayers. This companies are trading in the Chinese market over more than hundred years. Germany invested in a huge amount in the China market and further enhanced its outflow of investment from $800 to $7.9 million. The trade flow and the communication between China and Germany have been rapidly increasing. Currently there are 1500 companies in China representing the German investments (Mathews and Tan 2014). In the year 2002, $ 52.7 billion of FDI were attracted by China and it rose to $ 53 billion in 2003 and further it rose to $ 61 billion in 2004. During 2005, China topped the FDI Confidence Index for consecutive four years. Chinas FDI amounted to $73 billion until May 2007 (Buckley et al. 2017). The issues that are besetting Germanys foreign direct investment in China involve the sustained legal uncertainties existing within the country due to absence of intellectual property rights protection. There is also a huge increasing competition in China due to the rising attractiveness of its current market condition (Wang and Wong 2016). Hence as per the given context, the aim of this case study is to analyze the outlook as well as the intentions of German FDI in China by applying the OLI framework and their further evaluation. China is considered to be having low-cost assembly line that proves to be a major driver to invest in the country. Objectives of the Research The major purpose of this study is to identify the following: To identify the vital factors that attracts the potential German Companies for investing in China. To analyze the German FDI prospects and motives within the OLI framework in China. To analyze the causes and reasons of German FDI in Chinese market. To study the conditions and future prospects of Germanys expanded FDI. To explain theoretical base involving the activities of the German FDI within China. The objective of this research is to analyze the functions of OLI framework for rapid development, as a model for German FDI and MNEs in the growing Chinese market. Literature Review: This research report represents the range of published works that relates to the investigation and throws light on the important concepts. It includes the data used for the report and description of the methodology. Methodology and Data Used This study is generally qualitative in nature and involves reviews of the articles, journal, qualified and qualitative data related for the survey of prospects as well as motives within OLI framework: a Case Study OF German FDI in China. To conduct the case study, methodical and systematic review of visual or textual material is used. The study aims to reduce the potential cognitive biases and ensures the objectivity of the research. The execution of this study is done step by step under defined parameters and is in the following sequences: Description of objectives. Realization of the study of dataset and observations. Content analysis. Result formulation. The research relies on interpretations as it is value-bond. The research is primarily inductive while using techniques of discounting besides use of measurement done in natural settings. The research uses a case study to describe the German FDI in China. The data that are used for determining the complexity and particularity of the case is secondary data. These data have been collected by an individual and further used by the researcher for fulfilling their own motives (Vaccarini et al. 2017). Hence the data used are non-original in nature. In this research report, the data primarily used are from academic journals, books. Moreover, adequate resources available online that are related to the investigated topic. On the other hand, the search engines that are used to avail the needed documents are Google Scholar and Google as well. Literature Review on the Motives and Prospects of German FDI in China As per Chaudhuri and Mukhopadhyay (2014), the location characteristics of China would help in understanding and appreciating the huge FDI within the nation. The main elements for determining the factors of location-specific are the inflow of FDI are the dominant availability of cheap labors, export promotion strategy and the orientation related to export of FDI caused by several nations starting its business within China. In the incident of Taiwan and Hong Kong that provides a crucial link related to China is a vital element. Qualitative approach is used in the study to deal with the matter. It is revealed that the main focus of FDI in the market of China and it has been emerged as a great place for the potential nations to involve in the Chinese market of FDI. The main limitation that is further imposed through the case is its importance in Taiwan and China but this not involve its importance of German FDI that proves that the study is relevant. As per Chiu, Lo and Susy (2015) The German FDI involved in China is described to be growing larger in terms of size as well as higher quality besides the technological activities with broad market orientations and long term motives. German FDI further seeks and expands its new market share in China. The authors previous claim for the determinants of FDI in China includes export orientation and cheap abundant leaders. As the China domestic market is huge involving enforced tax incentives and access to the natural resources. The approach used in the research by the authors includes database analysis and mail services. The study is applicable for the current study due to its importance of the German FDI in the market of China. According to the study done by Meyer(2015), the survey for the cause of FDI in China for German organization is showcased. The author further shows the dissimilarity among the FDI in China or in other nation elsewhere as well as in exporting. The sector activity and size are controlled then the attributes related to the FDI in China includes employment, turnover, profit margins, net income and total assets. Due to China rapidly increasing business market it is profitable to invest in China than making FDI in any other country as it results in a profitable outcome. The methods used by Paul and Benito(2018) are generally descriptive and to address the research econometric analysis is used. This throws light on the topic through the description of German FDI and aiding the study. The main limitation related to this study is focused generally on the location specific factors involving FDI. Whereas, on the other hand, Quer, Claver and Rienda (2015) states that the FDIs embodied technology and its expansion are the two vital elements that developed the modernization and improvement of the automotive industry in China. After, Hong Kong and United States, Germany is a crucial source of the direct investment in Chinas automotive industry. During the 80s FDI in automotive industry was mainly focused on assembling the overall automobiles. Later during the 90s FDI was more used for manufacturing vehicles components (Penget al. 2017). During the period of 1990s, the Chinese government had stern management of Greenfield investment projects for the manufacturing of the vehicles. The early movers already occupied the dominant positions thereby increasing the entry barriers for the newcomers in the market. Since the 80s, the European automotive multinationals has greatly influenced and put a positive impact on the restructuring of automotives industry in China. Furthermore, the European automotive manufacturers from China have been linked with the agreements of cooperation related to local suppliers and Chinese government. They often extend financial and technical assistance to the existing local suppliers. Like in the case related to contribution of 5 billion Chinese Yuan for localization fund in Shanghai Volkswagen. The approach of Ayden, Demurrage and Tatoglu (2018), study is in chronological form, mainly related from the present secondary literature. The study is applicable and relevant for the research as it provides sufficient and useful insights about the automotive industry within China and furthers the development and improvement of the European FDI in the nation. This aids in analyzing the present outlook and purpose of German investment in China. Moreover, the limitation of this research is within the automotive manufacturing industry of China. Analysis and Discussion: The detailed discussion and analysis related to the study is affixed on the review by using OLI framework for analyzing the FDI of German in China. Analysis of German FDI in China Applying the OLI Framework The OLI framework is related with the three elements of advantages that are as, Ownership, Location and Internalization, which is crucial for organizational decision arising in the multinational operational level (Tavareset al. 2017). Ownership advantages reveal the reasons of firm operating abroad and indicate the multinational enterprises that are successful possess various benefits that are firm-specific that lead those to tackle the operating costs created in other country. On the other hand, location advantage concentrates on the main location for the multinational enterprises. Moreover, access to the natural resources further provides as the advantage of location for selecting China as a top country to invest, like the German FDI. The additional elements for selecting the vital location for investing in foreign countries include easily accessibility of trained labors and local infrastructure quality. The other crucial factors involve smooth and harmonious relationship with the Chinese authorities and experiences to cope up with the Chinese bureaucracy. This kind of relationship is the major bottom line of FDI from Germany to link with the cooperation agreements with the local suppliers and Chinese bureaucracy, as highlighted by Torres et al. (2017). Tuman and Shirali (2017) also throw light in his survey that the location characteristics of China provide in understanding and appreciating the huge FDI in the nation. Internalization advantages- this is the crucial determinant of OLI framework helps to ascertain the impact of an organizations operational activities that is carried abroad, generating a trade-off between monitoring costs and transaction savings of a fully- owned subsidiary. The vital characteristics of the approach are to lay emphasis on the benefits for individual firm. During 1970s FDI was regarded as a global movement for physical capital due to the increasing demands for higher returns according to Mathews and Tan (2014). The internalization advantage that is connected to the OLI framework, according to the study of Santangelo and Meyer (2017) in this literature review magnifies the major dissimilarities that are present among the conducted FDI in China or in other countries or via exporting. It aims to obtain the benefits from selecting the appropriate advantages options from the three determinants. The OLI framework serves to determine the organizations FDI activities beyond the domestic borders. The internalization theory of FDI is view MNEs as the firm that involves in utilizing their internal market to generate products and further distributing them effectively. Through FDI, all the MNEs are able to create and further distribute its product through internal market and hence enabling them to improve the total profit and optimizing efficient production (Tavareset al. 2017). This notion helps in determining the purpose and objectives of FDI from Germany in the market of China. Moreover, MNEs also possess horizontal and vertical integration that enables the generation of its own internal market. The immediate products like know-how and technology are further converted as the organizations most valuable asset. This further represents the advantages of ownership in the OLI framework as per Tuman and Shirali(2017). Therefore, the MNEs retains its competitive advantages through its ownership like the know-how of the management that can be further bolstered or utilized (Peng et al. 2017) The Uppsala Model further reviews the internationalization process as practical, cyclical and resource based learning that foresee the research flows regarding temporary competitive advantages and dynamic capabilities (Yao and Wang 2014). Furthermore, based on this study, the internationalization theory cannot be viewed as the separate entity from the viewpoint of OLI framework due to the reason it has same trail with similar framework related with the understanding the prospects and motives of the firm in Germany. Moreover, its main outlook is to engage its foreign direct investment in nation likes China. This theory further reveals that the mature phase related to the development of industrialization further laid down by the overall country and region involving high dynamic growth as per the research of Paul and Benito (2018). This is crucial to consider the OLI framework to be fastened beyond the theory of product cycle for analyzing the FDI of Germany in China. The relevance of the structure moreover cannot be kept aside, when the industrialization process is taken into account. The application of OLI structure uses sequential measures to discuss the increasing rate of European FDI in China. The three factors consisting of ownership, internalization and location specific are determinants of firms in the European nation, such as Germany to further invest in the automotive sector of China. Conclusion: This report focuses on analyzing the prospects and objectives of German FDI in China enclosed in the OLI framework. The rapidly increasing market in the global level assists the FDI from Germany to seek ongoing newer prospects of investment in China that is further surrounded by the rising rivalry and immense quest for the fierce advantage. The German FDI internalization advantage in China includes benefits availed operating the FDI in the state through exporting or rather elsewhere. The location specific advantages include export orientation of FDI and cheap trained labors. Finally the ownership advantages including the technology based infrastructure and the advanced management knowhow. Moreover, the OLI structure is a disciplinary model, which suits the various interrelated theories of FDI. Henceforth, these various issues involve limited market transparency, inefficient potential supplier networks and increasing changing regulatory obstacles and conditional frameworks. As there is problem caused due to identification of market segment on individual basis it further leads to the difficulty in gathering relevant information about the market condition. The potential German investor in China faces very high input prices including electricity and raw materials further making it highly difficult to reach the desired profit margins. Among the rising nations China is one of the huge recipients of direct investment from an international nation. Germany is directly involved in the management and operational activities to obtain maximum profit for the main purpose of gaining international capital output. Bibliography: Agarwal, J. and Wu, T., 2015. Factors influencing growth potential of E?commerce in emerging economies: An institution?based N?OLI framework and research propositions.Thunderbird International Business Review,57(3), pp.197-215. Andrews-Speed, P., Qiu, M. and Len, C., 2016. Chinese engagement in Southeast Asian energy and mineral resources: motivations and outlook.Eurasian Geography and Economics,57(3), pp.316-342. Ayden, Y., Demirbag, M. and Tatoglu, E., 2018. Theoretical Perspectives on Emerging Country Multinationals. InTurkish Multinationals(pp. 33-65). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Buckley, P.J., Clegg, L.J., Voss, H., Cross, A.R., Liu, X. and Zheng, P., 2017. A retrospective and agenda for future research on Chinese outward foreign direct investment.Journal of International Business Studies, pp.1-20. Chaudhuri, S. and Mukhopadhyay, U., 2014. Role of FDI in Developing Countries: Basic Concepts and Facts. InForeign Direct Investment in Developing Countries(pp. 1-17). Springer India. Chen, C. and Chen, C., 2016. The impact of foreign direct investment on urban-rural income inequality: Evidence from China.China Agricultural Economic Review,8(3), pp.480-497. Chiu, S.K., Lo, F.Y. and Susy, Y., 2015. Taiwanese Foreign Direct Investment in Southeast Asia: An Empirical Investigation of the OLI Framework.Journal of Economics and Management,11(2), pp.127-141. Mathews, J.A. and Tan, H., 2014. Entrepreneurial strategies in Asian latecomer firms.Handbook of East Asian Entrepreneurship, p.30. Meyer, K.E., 2015. What is strategic asset seeking FDI?.The Multinational Business Review,23(1), pp.57-66 Paul, J. and Benito, G.R., 2018. A review of research on outward foreign direct investment from emerging countries, including China: what do we know, how do we know and where should we be heading?.Asia Pacific Business Review,24(1), pp.90-115. Peng, Z., Qin, C., Chen, R.R., Cannice, M.V. and Yang, X., 2017. Towards a framework of reverse knowledge transfer by emerging economy multinationals: Evidence from Chinese MNE subsidiaries in the United States.Thunderbird International Business Review,59(3), pp.349-366. Quer, D., Claver, E. and Rienda, L., 2015. Chinese outward foreign direct investment: A review of empirical research.Frontiers of Business Research in China,9(3), p.326. Santangelo, G.D. and Meyer, K.E., 2017. Internationalization as an evolutionary process.Journal of International Business Studies,48(9), pp.1114-1130. Tavares Lehmann, A.T., Tavares Lehmann, A.T., Lehmann, F. and Lehmann, F., 2017. Outward direct investment by Chinese state-owned enterprises: Can host country policy act as a country-specific advantage?.Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal,27(3), pp.231-252. Torres Oliveira, R., Menzies, J., Borgia, D. and Figueira, S., 2017. Outward foreign direct investment from emerging countries: theoretical extension and evidence from China.The International Trade Journal,31(5), pp.402-428. Tuman, J.P. and Shirali, M., 2017. The political economy of Chinese foreign direct investment in developing areas.Foreign Policy Analysis,13(1), pp.154-167. Vaccarini, K., Spigarelli, F., Tavoletti, E. and Lattemann, C., 2017. Psychic distance and FDI: The case of China. InCultural Distance in International Ventures(pp. 9-41). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Wang, M. and Wong, M.S., 2016. Effects of foreign direct investment on firm-level technical efficiency: stochastic frontier model evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms.Atlantic Economic Journal,44(3), pp.335-361. Yao, S. and Wang, P., 2014. Literature on Chinas OFDI. InChinas Outward Foreign Direct Investments and Impact on the World Economy(pp. 11-24). Palgrave Macmillan UK. Yin, W., 2015. Motivations of Chinese outward foreign direct investment: An organizing framework and empirical investigation.Journal of International Business and Economy,16(1), pp.82-106. Ying, Y., Ping, D. and Yang, L., 2016. Strategic flexibility, institutional hardship, and international expansion strategy of Chinese new ventures.China: An International Journal,14(4), pp.118-130.